Nannan
Lord
[M:0]
Posts: 1,337
|
Post by Nannan on Mar 5, 2005 20:49:34 GMT -5
In my opinion: getting rid of no-post members will improve the quality of our forum. Remember: quality not quantity!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jamit on Mar 5, 2005 21:01:32 GMT -5
There not doing anything bad and they make LAML look good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sz_2cool4u2b on Mar 5, 2005 22:13:34 GMT -5
If your forum is not totally huge with thousands of members like SSD, then I'd keep them. Who knows, maybe one of them will soon become a top-poster. But if you have a huge forum, then I suggest getting rid of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by J1A3L5 on Mar 6, 2005 2:59:34 GMT -5
...and, ironically, it's stuff like this which is the reason I only infrequently post anymore.
-John "J1A3L5" Langrish.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paddy <3 Morphosis on Mar 6, 2005 4:04:50 GMT -5
Unless you can make them "inactive" and not count towards member count, might as well kick 'em. Otherwise, it's basically like crotch-stuffing your jeans.
|
|
Nannan
Lord
[M:0]
Posts: 1,337
|
Post by Nannan on Mar 6, 2005 13:26:35 GMT -5
Unless you can make them "inactive" and not count towards member count, might as well kick 'em. Otherwise, it's basically like crotch-stuffing your jeans.  right on |
|
|
|
Post by Jamit on May 11, 2005 21:13:30 GMT -5
I "smite" you because you want to kick them!
They look good so why delete them?
-Jamit
|
|
|
|
Post by TheQ on May 12, 2005 8:47:42 GMT -5
Well, do we want to look popular? I am in favor of kicking them out. There are members that haven't even posted once so they should be kicked.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sz_2cool4u2b on May 14, 2005 10:10:03 GMT -5
I'm sort of in between, don't care too much. Yes, kicking them will definitely improve the forum's quality, but also, some people might not want to join if we have to few of members.
|
|
+ WebMaster of LAML site